Wednesday, January 31, 2018

The 6 Critical Chatbot Statistics for 2018

The 6 Critical Chatbot Statistics for 2018

Although they’ve technically been around since the 1950s, virtual chatbots only recently became popularized, as brands implement them to reach more customers with greater efficiency.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, for example, launched a chatbot via Facebook Messenger called “BB” (stands for BlueBot). The primary function of BB is to help passengers book tickets and keep them up to date on flight status, gate changes, and similar data-driven functions.

The company built the chatbot to assist its human support team, which handles more than 16,000 customer interactions weekly, according to coverage on the MarTech Today blog. In just the first six months of operation, BB sent nearly two million messages to more than 500,000 customers. Recently, KLM expanded the reach of the chatbot by hooking it up to Google Home, adding an audio/voice layer—an interesting augmentation.

I wrote about the rise of chatbots in my book, Hug Your Haters, and since then the rollout of chatbots has become even more extensive. But as I wrote about recently here at Convince & Convert, the truth is that a lot of chatbots (and live chat technologies) frustrate and disappoint customers, the very group they are supposed to aid.

Despite the missteps in execution, most consumers (in all generational categories) are relatively bullish on what chatbots can do, when, and how.

This became clear in a 2018 research project that surveyed more than 1000 adults in the USA, aged 18 to 64, balanced by age and gender. The survey sampling was provided by SurveyMonkey Audience, and the study itself was written and conducted by Drift, Salesforce (disclosure: Salesforce is a sponsor of my podcast, SocialPros), and myclever.

You may download a copy of the entire study here—no email address required. I have summarized the findings for you in this post, the 6 Critical Chatbot Statistics for 2018.

Chatbots and Amazon Alexa Are Equally Popular

Certainly, as we found in the Hug Your Haters research, telephone and email are still the most common forms of interaction between customers and companies.

60 percent of survey respondents say they have used these mechanisms to interact with a business in the past 12 months.

38 percent say they have used online chat in the prior year.

30 percent indicate they’ve used a company’s mobile app to interact.

28 percent have engaged with a business in social media.

As of 2018, 15 percent of American adults (per this survey) say they have used a chatbot to interact with a company in the prior 12 months. This is almost precisely the same percentage of Americans who own a smart speaker (Amazon Alexa, Google Home, et al.) as of January, 2018 per research from our friends at Edison.

15% of American adults have used a chatbot. 16% own a smart speaker like Amazon Alexa.
Click To Tweet
37 Percent of Americans Would Use a Chatbot in an Emergency

The survey respondents were asked what they would use a chatbot for, if available.

Interestingly, the most common use case for chatbots is “getting a quick answer in an emergency” at 37 percent. Personally, if I have an emergency, I’m not sure THAT’s the time I’m likely to turn to a robot for fast and accurate guidance.

The second-most-common use case is “resolving a complaint or problem” at 35 percent. This makes a ton of sense, and I profiled several companies (most notably, HP) in the Hug Your Haters book that are using chatbots to augment customer service, like KLM above.

Getting detailed answers or explanations is how 35 percent of respondents might use a chatbot. This is problematic today, as many of the circumstances where early-stage chatbots fall apart is in nuanced, specific requests from customers. Because chatbots—even with artificial intelligence—can only respond to what they are programmed to respond to, detailed answers are not where they tend to shine.

34 percent of respondents say they would use a chatbot to find a human customer service assistant. This one is pretty meta. If we have to use a robot to find a real person, that doesn’t say much for the capabilities of the robot, does it?

Other uses of chatbots make more sense (at least to me). They include:

  • Making a reservation: 33 percent
  • Paying a bill: 29 percent
  • Adding yourself to a mailing list: 22 percent

37% of Americans would use a chatbot to get a quick answer, in an emergency.
Click To Tweet
24-Hour Service Is the Number One Chatbot Benefit

Participants in this survey were also asked about the primary benefits of chatbots, provided they were available and working for the online services these Americans used most.

Speed and availability are where chatbots are perceived to provide the most value to consumers.

Specifically, 64 percent of respondents said “24-hour service” is a benefit of chatbots.

The second most mentioned benefit is “getting an instant response,” mentioned by 55 percent of the participants.

“Getting answers to simple questions” (55 percent) and “easy communication” (51 percent) were also mentioned by more than half of respondents.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, “friendliness and approachability” (32 percent) are not areas where consumers believe chatbots are particularly strong. This is despite the manifest efforts of many brands to make their chatbots more “human.” Plenty of work to do in this regard, it appears.

64% of Americans say 24-hour service is the best feature of chatbots. Do you agree?
Click To Tweet
Chatbots Are Equally Popular Among Millennials and Baby Boomers

This finding surprised me somewhat. The research discovered that the perceived benefits of chatbots are roughly equivalent among younger Millennials consumers and older Baby Boomer Americans. In fact, in several areas, Boomers are actually MORE bullish about chatbots’ potential that are members of the younger cohort.

For example, 61 percent of participating Baby Boomers say a potential chatbot benefit is “getting an instant response,” while just 51 percent of Millennials say the same.

Let’s recognize that “potential benefits” do not equal “usage,” but these findings indicate that older Americans are at least open to the premise of useful chatbots.

Millennials and Baby Boomers are equally bullish on the potential of chatbots.
Click To Tweet
Nearly Half of American Adults Would Prefer to Deal with a Human

In the survey, participants were asked a simple and important question: “What would STOP you from using a chatbot?”

The number one answer is a tough one for chatbots to overcome, at least for a while: our innate desire to interact with other humans.

43 percent of adult Americans say they prefer to deal with a real-life assistant, rather than a chatbot.

I guess you can look at that as a half-full or half-empty statistic. On one hand, nearly half the country would just prefer to handle their business with another person. Fair enough. However, nearly six in 10 Americans do not object to using a chatbot in some circumstances.

As chatbots improve, it will be fascinating to see if this objection fades away.

The second hurdle for chatbot usage is actually related to the first. 30 percent say that they “worry about the chatbot making a mistake.”

Conversely, on the other end of the response scale, 15 percent of survey participants indicate that NOTHING would stop them from using a chatbot. That’s a high level of trust in technology!

15% of Americans say nothing would stop them from using a chatbot.
Click To Tweet
Users Prefer Chatbots Over Apps When Communicating with Companies

In almost every case, respondents indicate they believe chatbots offer more benefits when communicating with businesses, in comparison to apps. The biggest difference is in the area of “getting quick answers to simple questions,” where 69 percent of participants say chatbots are up to the task, compared to 51 percent for apps.

Users also believe chatbots to be superior in the areas of “24-hour service” (62 percent versus 54 percent and “ability to easily register a complaint” (33 percent versus 24 percent) among others.

Apps fare better than chatbots in just three categories, but they are all important:

  • Convenience (chatbots, 53 percent versus apps, 57 percent)
  • Ease of communication (chatbots, 35 percent versus apps, 41 percent)
  • A good customer experience (chatbots, 28 percent versus apps, 30 percent)

It’s interesting that in the circumstances where users believe chatbots to be superior, they’re FAR superior. But in the core function of easy, convenient, and customer experience, apps are perceived to be better, for now.

The full study also includes comparisons between chatbots and email, and chatbots and the telephone.

Compared to apps, chatbots are believed to be faster, but not as convenient.
Click To Tweet

Chatbots are popping up like dandelions, and companies are rolling them out to save money and (in theory) add customer convenience. In 2018, overall consumer reaction to chatbots is positive, but still somewhat wary. This is probably wise, as chatbots will only get better as the artificial intelligence underpinnings improve, and businesses learn lessons (sometimes the hard way) about how best to utilize this new technology.

If my team and I here at Convince & Convert can help you stay ahead of customer expectations in the area of email/chatbots/messaging, please get in touch about a free analysis. We create Digital Marketing Maturity Maps for some of the world’s most interesting brands, and guide them as they accelerate, measure, and propel their digital. 

http://ift.tt/2BGLeVJ

10 Design Tools Social Media Marketers Should Use to Create Instagram Content

10 Design Tools Social Media Marketers Should Use to Create Instagram Content

When it comes to visual content, Instagram is one of the best places to go if you want to see stunning examples of great visuals.

In fact, Instagram is a social media channel that is focused on photos and videos. It’s a great place for a marketer to convey a message to a specific audience but at the same time, in order for that message to be effective, it needs to be paired with great visuals too.

Social media marketers are always searching for the better and more effective ways to send their messages. For Instagram, however, in order to be successful, you need to focus primarily on the quality of the visual content. For this, you need the best tools and of course, the best resources you can find.

Let us help you in this quest and ease all your research efforts.

http://ift.tt/2BFcSTc

How to Drive Traffic With Your Facebook Cover Photo

Want to drive Facebook traffic to your website without using ads? Wondering how your Facebook cover image can help? In this article, you’ll discover how to use your Facebook cover image to generate clicks that convert into leads. Why Use Your Facebook Cover Photo in a Lead Capture Campaign? One frustration for businesses on Facebook

This post How to Drive Traffic With Your Facebook Cover Photo first appeared on .
- Your Guide to the Social Media Jungle

http://ift.tt/2rU4z6j

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

This Is How Fast Influencer Marketing Is Changing

This Is How Fast Influencer Marketing Is Changing

#InfluencerGoals. If you don’t have them, you know someone who does. Take a quick video, snap a few selfies, multiply your Instagram hashtags, and bam! Influence.

At least that’s how it’s perceived by marketers and wannabes who don’t understand how someone evolves from a content creator into an influencer. As marketers, we’re guilty of promoting that notion too. After all, brands who need help raising their profile are a dime a dozen.

In short, online influence works. Influencer marketing can generate 11 times the ROI of traditional advertising, which is music to every marketer’s ears. Seems easy enough, right? It may look that way on the surface. But building and sustaining influence takes more effort than posting a handful of selfies or Snaps each week.

There’s a disconnect between creators and those who want to hire them. It’s easy to overlook the investment a creator puts into building a brand, engaging an audience, and making money from their efforts. Whether you’re an online content creator, a wannabe influencer, or the agency looking to hire influencers and understand why they get paid, keep reading. With a hat tip to the Creator Monetization Report 2017, we’ll dive into who these creators are and how they produce and monetize their content as they build influence.

Influencer marketing can generate 11X the ROI of traditional advertising.
Click To Tweet
Calculating the Average Workload of Content Creators

Many online content creators don’t limit themselves to publishing on just one platform. Here’s an analysis of the different types of content creators make:

  • Bloggers: 36 percent of bloggers create video content, 17 percent do live video, and eight percent podcast.
  • Video creators: 26 percent of video creators also create blog posts, 24 percent use live video, and seven percent podcast.
  • Podcasters: 55 percent of podcasters also blog, 40 percent use video, and 31 percent are using live video.

Creators are blogging an average of seven times per month. Those that identify primarily as bloggers tend to publish more—on average nine times per month. In addition, bloggers publish approximately eight times a month across other media channels. This includes podcasts (twice monthly), live video (twice monthly), and pre-produced video (four times a month).

Based on this frequency, a blogger’s publishing schedule could look something like this:

  • Week one: Two blog posts, live video hit, and a produced video that ties into one of the blog posts.
  • Week two: Two blog posts, a podcast episode, and a produced video that promotes what’s on the blog.
  • Week three: Two blog posts, plus one live video and one edited video.
  • Week four: Three blogs posts, including one that ties into a podcast episode, and one produced video clip that also promotes the podcast.

Tallied up, that is a minimum of FOUR pieces of published content each week. But wait, there’s more.

Influencer Content Creation Is On the Rise

Over the next year, creators plan on increasing their publishing frequency for video (74 percent), blog posts (66 percent), live video (58 percent), and podcasting (34 percent).

How will creators change their publication frequency in the next year?

How will creators change their publication frequency in the next year?

A blogger committed to growing their blog and brand must continue to find opportunities to create even more content. It’s no surprise that video appears to be the medium of choice for the majority of creators, since 96 percent of all US teens watch YouTube and most consume two hours of YouTube video per day.

Creators will flock to Stories (on Instagram, Snapchat, or Facebook, depending on the intended audience) to level up their video posts and uncover new ways to connect with audiences.

Grow Audiences and Sustain Attention With Email

Creating and publishing content is only one step of the creator’s process. When we evaluate influencers for our consulting clients, we do look at site traffic and social media audience sizes. But often, we cannot publicly find another key validation metric. One undeniably important audience base for influencers, however, is their email list. Successful creators rely on audience bases they can reach with new content, and email is the last surefire way to reach an audience organically.

At Convince & Convert, we’ve dialed up and back the number of emails we send weekly to our subscribers who want to stay in touch. After years of sending emails nearly every weekday, we dialed back our email frequency. We’ve focused our efforts on the one “ON” email sent by Jay Baer on Sundays. (Click to subscribe—it’s worth your time!)

One email to subscribers weekly is a standard frequency. Subscribers will also tolerate one or two additional emails each month that feature a specific piece of content or a product, provided it adds value in exchange for their attention.

When we add email to the creators’ expected content production schedule, it starts to look like this:

  • Week one: Two blog posts, live video hit, and a produced video that ties into one of the blog posts, plus one email to subscribers.
  • Week two: Two blog posts, a podcast interview, and a produced video that promotes what’s on the blog, plus one email to subscribers.
  • Week three: Two blog posts, plus one live video and one edited video, plus one weekly email and one in-depth email to subscribers.
  • Week four: Three blogs posts, including one that ties into a podcast episode, and one produced video clip that also promotes the podcast, plus one email to subscribers.
Be Present and Engage With Online Communities

Creators become “Influencers” with a capital “I” when they demonstrate the ability to influence or engage their audience, which doesn’t come as easily as you think. Making the leap into true influence requires additional time spent cultivating a community of your audience, getting to know them, and being present for them, beyond a blog and social media posts. Influencers have to establish credibility while maintaining a sense of approachability. Otherwise, they risk alienating the audience they are attempting to serve.

Community management requires dedicated daily time spent:

  • Reading and responding to comments, messages, and emails.
  • Watching and engaging (Likes! Hearts!) from within your community.
  • Find and follow others to grow your network and reach.
  • Participate in groups within your niche or with like-minded communities.
  • Promoting your content and sharing content from others you follow.

Expect to spend seven to ten hours weekly (minimum one hour/day) focused on community management activities.

Where’s the Payoff? How Creators Make Their Money

Over a quarter (28 percent) of creators surveyed for the Creator Monetization Report don’t make any money from their content. But a nearly equal number of respondents (29 percent) said online content is their main source of revenue. The majority of creators (62 percent) are not satisfied with their monetization income, even though creators are seeing increases in revenue year over year.

Advertising is both the number one way creators monetize content and the most lucrative source of creator income. Some also subsidize their work through affiliate commissions, brand deals, or sponsorships, though usually at a lower share of total income.

There’s no industry standard rate card for influencer marketing. Rates vary by creator, by type or number of posts, or by time spent in a branded experience. Some influencer agreements are based on quantity, but it’s not uncommon to strike a deal based on cost per engagement, cost per click, or cost per acquisition, similar to other online advertising options.

Influencers with 50,000 to 500,000 followers can ask upwards of $400 for posting a single tweet, around $1,000 for an Instagram or Snapchat post, and (for video creators) $2,500 to produce a YouTube video.

Creators can also monetize their influence by selling more of themselves. They might turn to consulting and speaking, two popular ways to parlay thought leadership into a steady income. They might produce their own product and sell it to earn passive income. These kinds of products might include:

  • Templates or customizable products
  • Online courses
  • Books and ebooks
  • Mastermind or private coaching groups
  • Specific repeatable services that align with expertise

Creators intend to increase revenue opportunities in the next year by selling their own products, increasing advertising opportunities, consulting/services, and aligning with brands through deals or sponsorships.

How will creators change their monetization plans over the next year?

How will creators change their monetization plans over the next year?

Creators Are Making Investments to Become Influencers

Making content, even a ton of content, doesn’t result in immediate influence. Creators who want to monetize their content and products aren’t settling for random acts of content. They’re focused on creating content that intentionally drives engagement and grows their audience. Influencers show up and are present for their audience base. They’re thinking beyond traditional content and creating products or services that monetize their efforts even more.

Attaching recognizable faces (celebrities, athletes, etc.) to brands or products to increase awareness and boost sales is a core marketing principle. Only now, influence is more democratized. Billions of social media users have the ability to create content and build audiences around even the tiniest niche. Intention and investment are the ways influencers will separate themselves from the deep pool of creators.

http://ift.tt/2nmSSQL

How to Promote Your Ecommerce Store’s Promo Codes on Social Media

How to Promote Your Ecommerce Store’s Promo Codes on Social Media

For many e-commerce business owners today, promo codes are a necessary evil. You have to create discounts and post them on coupon sites in order to keep up with the competition, and there’s no way around it.

But promo codes don’t have to be all about sacrificing revenue to encourage sales. If you use your promo codes strategically, they can help drive major sales growth — even if you’re offering a big discount.

You just need to leverage social media to gain more traction with your audience and really stand out. Here’s how to do it.

Define your goals

Just as with any marketing endeavor, you must first define your goals before you create your social media promotion campaign. Promo codes aren’t just used for attracting new customers. You can also encourage customer retention when you share them with your social audience.

http://ift.tt/2nlSnGK

How to Use Facebook Lead Ads for More Prospects

Need more qualified leads from Facebook? Have you used Facebook lead ads? With the arrival of Facebook Zero, pages will effectively see little or no organic reach without some form of ad budget. The money you spend needs to show a return. In this article, you’ll discover how to use Facebook lead ads to collect

This post How to Use Facebook Lead Ads for More Prospects first appeared on .
- Your Guide to the Social Media Jungle

http://ift.tt/2DWNRYB

An Introduction to Google Tag Manager

Posted by Angela_Petteys

Digital marketing thrives on data. No matter what type of site you have, whether it’s a large e-commerce site, a personal website, or a site for a small business, it’s essential to understand how people interact with your site. Google Analytics can provide a lot of the important insights you’re looking for, but when used alone, it does have its limitations. But by tagging your site and using Google Tag Manager in conjunction with Google Analytics, you’re able to collect much more data than you can otherwise.

Tags are snippets of code which are added to a site to collect information and send it to third parties. You can use tags for all sorts of purposes, including scroll tracking, monitoring form submissions, conducting surveys, generating heat maps, remarketing, or tracking how people arrive at your site. They’re also used to monitor specific events like file downloads, clicks on certain links, or items being removed from a shopping cart.

Sites commonly use several different tags and the amount of code needed to create them all can be pretty overwhelming, especially if you’re trying to add or edit tags by going directly into the site’s source code. Google Tag Manager is a tool with a user-friendly, web-based interface that simplifies the process of working with tags. With GTM, you’re able to add, edit, and disable tags without having to touch the source code.

While GTM is, obviously, a Google product, it’s hardly limited to just working with tags for other Google services like AdWords or Analytics. You can use it to manage many different third-party tags, including Twitter, Bing Ads, Crazy Egg, and Hotjar, just to name a few. If there’s another tag which doesn’t have a template in GTM, you can add your own custom code. There are only a few types of tags GTM doesn’t work well with.

The pros and cons of GTMLessens reliance on web devs

By far, the biggest benefit to Google Tag Manager is that it makes it easier for marketers to implement tags without having to rely on web developers to do it for them. Developers are usually busy with other high-priority projects, so tagging often ends up on the back burner. But since Google Tag Manager helps you avoid touching the source code, marketers can quickly add and make changes to tags on their own. This is a big advantage if, for example, you only need to use a tag to collect data for a very brief amount of time. Without GTM, there’s a good chance that it would take longer for the tag to be added than it would actually be live for.

Still requires some technical implementation

Although GTM helps reduce the reliance on developers, it doesn’t completely eliminate it. You’ll still need someone to add the container code to each page of your site. And while GTM has plenty of tag templates to choose from which are easy enough for a non-developer to work with, more complex customized tags will likely require the help of someone who really understands coding. If you have existing tags that were manually added to your site’s source code, those will need to be removed first so that you don’t end up with duplicate data.

Most businesses can benefit from using it

Businesses of any size can potentially benefit from GTM. Since GTM makes it so much easier to add and edit tags without a developer, it’s great for smaller businesses that might have limited access to technical support. And since sites for enterprise-level businesses can easily use dozens of tags, GTM makes it easier to manage them all and improves site speed by helping them load more efficiently.

Tags can slow down site speed if fired synchronously

One issue with traditional tracking tags is that if they fire synchronously, they can slow down site speeds. When tags fire synchronously, one tag being slow to load slows down all the other tags that are waiting on it. And the longer a site takes to load, the more likely it is that people will leave without converting. But tags created in GTM load asynchronously by default, meaning each tag can fire anytime it’s ready to. If you need to control the order in which your tags are fired, there is tag sequencing and firing priority functionality to let you do that.

Can be used for AMP sites and mobile apps, as well

You’re not even limited to just using GTM with standard websites. GTM can also be used to manage tags for AMP sites and mobile apps. In the case of mobile apps, GTM can be a huge help since it lets you add and edit your tags without having to issue an updated version of your app, which users might not be quick to actually download. In some respects, using GTM for AMP sites or mobile apps is pretty similar to using it for a regular website, but they do have their differences. In this guide, we’re going to focus on using GTM for web.

Components of tags & GTM

On the surface, tags and tag managers are pretty straightforward. But before you can start working with them, there are a few main concepts you’ll need to know about.

Containers

When you start working with GTM, the first thing you’ll need to do is create a container. A container essentially “holds” all the tags for your site.

After creating a new container, GTM gives you some code to add to your site. This is your container code and it will need to be added to the source code so it displays on each page of your site. Some CMSes, such as WordPress, have plugins to help add the container code for you, but you may need to contact your web developer to have it added. Once you’ve done that, you’ll be able to add, edit, disable, or remove your tags as needed through GTM.

Triggers

Each tag on a site needs to serve a specific purpose. Maybe you want to have a tag send information when someone downloads a file, when an outbound link is clicked, or when a form is submitted. These sorts of events are known as triggers and all tags need to have at least one trigger assigned to it; otherwise, it’s not going to do anything.

Triggers can be broken down into two main components: events and filters. When you go to configure a trigger in GTM, you’ll be given a long list of types of triggers to choose from. These are your events. Once you choose an event, you’ll be able to set up your filter.

Filters can be divided further down into three parts: variables, operators, and values. We’ll talk more about variables in just a minute, but in this case, it refers to the type of variable involved. The operator tells the tag whether an event needs to equal (or if it should be greater or less than a certain value, contain a certain value, etc.) And of course, the value is the condition which needs to be met. Even though the word “value” is typically used in reference to numbers and prices, remember that in this case, it doesn’t necessarily have to be a numerical value. In many cases, your value will be something like a URL or a keyword.

For example, let’s say I wanted to see how many people were reading the blog content on my site in depth. I could create a tag with a Scroll Depth event trigger that should fire when the vertical scroll depth reaches 75%. If I wanted this to fire on every page of my site, I could leave the “All Pages” option selected in the trigger configuration box and I wouldn’t have to create any further filters. But since I’m focusing on blog content, I’d choose “Some Pages” and create the filter “Page URL” “Contains” “fakewebsitename.com/blog.”

There might also be some circumstances when you don’t want a tag to fire. In this case, you can create a blocking trigger to prevent it from firing on those occasions. GTM prioritizes blocking triggers over other types of triggers, so if you have a blocking trigger that contradicts a condition set by another trigger, Google Tag Manager will follow what’s specified by the blocking trigger. For instance, if you have a tag that’s set to fire on all of your pages, but there are a few pages you’d like to have excluded from that, you can just use a blocking trigger to prevent it from firing on those few pages.

Variables & constants

While tags depend on triggers, triggers depend on variables. Variables contain the value a trigger needs to evaluate to know whether or not it should fire. The tag compares the value of the variable to the value defined in the trigger and if the variable meets the conditions of the trigger, the tag will fire.

Tags also use variables to collect information that can be passed onto the data layer as a user interacts with the site. A common example of this would be if a tag was set to fire when a person adds a certain amount of products to their shopping cart.

Variables can often be reused between tags. One of the most popular tips for using GTM is to create constant variables with the ID numbers or tracking codes you’ll need to use more than once. For example, if you’ll need to use your Google Analytics property ID number in multiple tags, you could just create a constant string variable with the value being your ID number. That way, instead of repeatedly having to look up and enter your ID number, you could just select the variable name.

When using GTM, you’ll be working with two different types of variables: built-in variables and user-defined variables. Built-in variables are some of the most commonly used types of variables, so Google went ahead and made them easy to access in GTM.

Google Tag Manager Built In Variables.png

Once you select a built-in variable, you’ll be able to configure its settings however you’d like. Note that these are just a few of the built-in variables for regular web containers. You can find more built-in variables by clicking the “Configure” button. If you’re using GTM for AMP sites or mobile apps, you may see different options to choose from.

If you need another type of variable that’s not included as a built-in variable, you can create a user-defined variable. When you go to add a user-defined variable, you’ll be given a list of types of variables to choose from. For more information on each type of variables, Simo Ahava has a very helpful guide to different variable types.

Variables can be created from the GTM dashboard by clicking on the “Variable” option on the left side menu. You can also create them while you’re creating a tag by clicking on the button next to the field that looks like a Lego block with a plus sign on it.

Data layers

Tags need information to know whether or not they should fire, but how (or where) do they get that information? One way they could find it is by checking the page’s HTML structure, but that’s really not an ideal solution. When tags need to search through HTML to find what they’re looking for, it can take longer for them to fire. And if the site’s HTML structure changes over time, tags can break. Besides, there are certain types of information a tag might need which won’t be found in a page’s HTML, like a transaction total.

A data layer is a JavaScript object which keeps the information tags need separate from the rest of your site’s code. Since tags don’t have to spend time searching through the HTML to find the information they need, this is another way GTM can help improve site speed. Instead, everything they’re looking for can be found in one place and it’s readily available when the page loads.

Technically, data layers are optional. You don’t have to specifically define one yourself; GTM can initiate one for you. But if you want to use GTM to track specific events, you’ll need to have a data layer.

To start off with, a new data layer object will look like this:

Empty Data Layer Code.png

When adding a data layer, the object needs to be placed before the GTM container code. If the data layer object is placed after the container code, GTM won’t be able to access the information in it and the data layer will basically reset after loading.

Once the data layer object has been added to a page’s code, the brackets in the second line can be populated with information, variables, and events. Some types of information can be written directly into the data layer, but other types of information can be pushed into the data layer dynamically as a user interacts with your site, such as if someone downloads a file or if they add a certain amount of products to their shopping cart.

Working with GTMCreating accounts and containers

To get started, go to tagmanager.google.com and create an account. Under “Setup Account,” enter the name of the company whose site is being managed and hit “Continue.”

01 Creating a GTM Account.png

Next, you’ll set up your container. Enter your domain name as the container name, choose which type of page or app it will be used on, and click “Create.” If you choose iOS or Android, you’ll also have to specify whether you’re using Firebase SDK or a legacy SDK.

02 Setup Container.png

Note that I specifically said to use the company name as the account name and the site’s domain for the container name. In theory, you can name these anything you want. This is just how Google recommends naming them as a best practice. Generally speaking, one of the best things you can do when working with GTM is make sure everything is named very clearly. Otherwise, it’s very easy for mistakes to be made.

Multiple GTM accounts can be managed within a single GTM account, but Google advises creating one container per domain. You don’t have to create separate containers for each individual tag or for every individual page on a site; all tags can all be placed within one container.

For most companies and organizations, one container is all they’ll need. But in the case of a company that has subsidiaries or owns separate businesses, the website for each subsidiary/business should get its own container and all the containers can be managed from one main GTM account. If a site has a subdomain that is treated separately from the main domain, the subdomain should also be given its own container.

When a marketing agency is managing tags on behalf of a company, Google recommends that the company create their own GTM account, then add the agency’s Google account as a user. This way, the agency can access GTM, but it’s easy for the company to revoke access should they decide to change agencies.

After creating your container, accept the GTM terms of service and you’ll be given your container code.

03 GTM Container Code.png

Once the container code has been added, you’re able to start creating tags. But before you get started, it’s a good idea to take some time to figure out exactly which tags you want to add. Even though there aren’t any limits to the amount of tags you can put in a container, for best performance, Google advises keeping the amount of tags you use to a minimum. If you’re migrating your tags to GTM from another tag manager or are making the switch from tags coded in your source code, this is a good time to review the tags currently on your site. In many cases, sites have tags that are associated with services they’re no longer using or were used to track things that aren’t being monitored anymore, so this is a good opportunity to "clean house," so to speak.

Creating a tag

When you create or select a container, the first thing you’ll see is the GTM dashboard. We’ll eventually get around to talking about almost everything you see here, but let’s begin by creating a tag. Click “Add a New Tag” to open up a window where you’ll be able to name and configure your tag.

04 GTM Dashboard.png

Before we go any further into the process of creating tags, remember to name your tags very clearly. Since sites often use several different tags, you won’t want there to be any confusion about which tag does what. Google’s recommended tag naming convention is: Tag Type - Detail - Location. For example, a Google Analytics tag that tracks form submissions on a Contact Us page would be named “GA - Form Submission - Contact Us.” Including the location of a tag in its name is a good idea because it helps distinguish it from similar tags on other pages. So if I had other GA form submission tags on my site, specifying that this one is on the Contact Us page would help me avoid editing the wrong one by mistake.

Putting the tag type at the beginning of a tag name also helps keep your tags organized. GTM lists tags alphabetically, so if you’re creating multiple tags for the same service or tool, all of those tags will all be grouped together and easy to find.

Now, back to creating a tag. When you click “Add a new tag” on the dashboard, this is the window you’ll see. Choose “Tag Configuration” and you’ll be given a long list of tag templates, which includes many of the most commonly used types of tags. If any of these are what you’re looking for, click on it and enter the information requested. If you don’t see the type of tag you want to create listed, choose “Custom HTML” to add your own code.

Since the exact information you’ll need to provide will vary depending on which type of tag you’re working with, I can’t possibly go into how to make every single type of tag. But as an example, let’s say I wanted to notify Google Analytics anytime someone views my pricing page. After choosing Universal Analytics, this is what I’d see:

GA Pricing Page Tag Configuration Example.jpg

All I would need to do is choose “Page View” from the “Track Type” dropdown menu, then enter the variable with my Google Analytics account information. If I hadn’t created that variable ahead of time, I could make one now by clicking the dropdown menu under “Google Analytics Settings” and choosing “New Variable.”

If I wanted to make changes to the tag firing sequence or create a firing schedule, I could do that by clicking on the “Advanced Settings” option. Click outside the tag configuration window to go back to the previous screen.

Next, you’ll need to create at least one trigger. Click the “Triggering” box underneath “Tag Configuration” to get started. If you don’t have a previously created trigger to choose from in the list that opens up, click the + sign in the upper right corner of the window. This will bring up a new window where you’ll be asked to name your new trigger. Do that and click on the “Tag Configuration” box so see a list of trigger types. In my case, I’d choose “Page View.”

Remarketing Trigger Configuration Example.jpg

Since I only want my tag to fire on one page, I’d choose “Some Page Views,” then create a filter specifying that the page URL needs to equal the URL of my pricing page. If I had another filter to add, I could click the plus (+) button next to the filter to set one up. If I had created multiple filters for this tag and later decided to get rid of one of them, all I’d have to do is hit the subtract (–) button next to the filter in question. When you’re done, click outside the window to exit.

Once your tag and trigger have been configured, save it and you can either keep working by creating more tags or you can preview your tag and make sure it’s working correctly before publishing it.

Previewing, debugging, and publishing tags

GTM’s “Preview & Debug” mode lets you test tags before publication so that you can make sure everything is working correctly and that you won’t have any errors throwing off your data.

To enter “Preview & Debug,” click the “Preview” button in the upper right corner of the GTM dashboard and you’ll see an orange banner notifying you that you are now in “Preview” mode. Next, open the site you’re tagging. If you already have your site open in another tab, refresh the page and you should see a “Debug” panel at the bottom of your screen. (Don’t worry, visitors to your site won’t be able to see it.)

The “Debug” panel shows all sorts of detailed information about your tags, triggers, and data layer. On the left side of the panel is an event timeline summary, which outlines all the events that occur in the data layer. At a minimum, you should be seeing at least three events listed here: Page View, DOM Ready, and Window Loaded. It’s OK to see more than three events, but if any of those three are missing, there’s a problem that needs to be fixed.

When you click on any of the events in your timeline, you’ll see all the tags which are set to fire when that event occurs. Click on any of the tags to see more detailed information about its triggers, properties, and if there are any blocking triggers associated with it.

As you work in “Preview & Debug” mode, you’re the only one who can see the information about your tags. But let’s say you’re working as part of a team on a tagging project and you find an issue you want to bring to another person’s attention. There is a way to do that. Switch back over to your GTM dashboard and look at the orange banner. On the right, there’s a “Share Preview” button. Click on it and you’ll bring up a box where you can enter the URL of the page in question. This will generate a preview link you can use to send to another person.

If you’re having a hard time getting “Preview & Debug” to work correctly, Analytics Mania has a great guide to solving some of the most common reasons why this happens.

Even after a tag has been published, Google still makes it easy to go back and check to make sure there aren’t any problems. Google Tag Assistant is a free Chrome extension and once it’s installed, you can visit any page on your site and it will tell you if your tags are firing correctly or if there are any improvements that could be made. GTA uses a three color system to indicate its findings: green, blue, and red. Green means all of your tags are working, blue means GTA has suggestions for how a tag could be improved, and red means it’s not working.

Once it appears that all of your tags are firing correctly, you can go ahead and publish them. From the GTM dashboard, hit the “Submit” button in the upper right corner and you’ll be asked to review your changes. If everything looks OK, enter a name and description for your new container version and publish it.

When you publish changes in GTM, it creates a new version of your container. If there’s ever a problem and you have to revert to an earlier version of your container, all you have to do is click the “Versions” button at the top of the GTM dashboard, choose the version you’d like to revert to from the list, click “Action,” then “Publish.”

If you’re migrating your tags from another tag manager or from hard-coded tags on your site, Google advises setting up all of your tags in GTM, then removing your old tags all at once and publishing the GTM..

http://ift.tt/2ElmnJY

Monday, January 29, 2018

Are Buyer Personas Really Dead?

Are Buyer Personas Really Dead

I’ll let you in on one of our trade secrets. At Ceralytics, we have four distinct buyer personas. We created them in the early days of our company and used them to build out our product and develop our market strategy. We updated them over time as we learned more about our audience’s needs and pain points. Now, we’re scrapping those buyer personas and moving to a new approach.

For a long time, we have believed in and promoted the use of buyer personas in marketing, especially in the creation of content strategies. In fact, it’s a part of our “Define Your Audience” step in the seven steps we use to create content strategies for our clients.

But we’ve noticed the time we spend updating and modifying buyer personas to keep up with new intelligence far outweighs the time we’ve been able to use the buyer persona itself to create content. So why spend time updating something that we seldom use?

Have you also found yourself wondering why should you bother with buyer personas?

The Case Against Buyer Personas

At Social Fresh 2017, Christopher Barger of Brain+Trust Partners suggested that trying to categorize your audience into very specific buckets is simply not relevant anymore.

“User personas were great 15 to 20 years ago. But personas are based on assumptions we made about our audience. Now, we don’t have to assume because we have the ability to be data-driven,” says Barger. “Technology enables us to have real data about our audience from dozens of sources. When you put these all together, you will naturally see how people interact with your content and your brand.”

Every one of your buyers is very unique. Knowing your customer no longer means to categorizing them into a nice, neat persona like this:

Ceralytics buyer persona

Ceralytics’ buyer persona for a content marketing manager

Instead, understanding your buyer means knowing:

  • How they interact with your content.
  • How they interact with your competitors’ content.
  • Where they get their news.
  • What topics truly resonate with them.
  • How those topics drive them to action.
  • The channels that get them to engage with you.
  • And most importantly, their pain points.

While personas can be a good starting point, they are often based on assumptions and are overly broad. Even personas we round out with data still assume that everyone in a certain category has the same needs and pain points. We need to move from assuming what a category of people wants to knowing what point points individuals have.

Our Buyer Personas

At Ceralytics, our four buyer personas are all within the marketing field. However, we’ve had real clients who are CEOs, COOs, and heads of business development. We don’t have buyer personas for these people, so should we create them?

We debated it. After all, we’ve proven that these people are our audience; they’ve been on calls with us, asking questions and seeking solutions to problems they had. But their titles really had nothing to do with their need. What they all had in common were pain points: lack of clarity around how to position their brand and what content they should use to communicate with their audiences, both in terms of marketing and sales.

After some deliberation, we opted not to create buyer personas for these people, but rather take their pain points and add them to a faceless persona with no title. Then, we found that a lot of our clients and prospects fit that faceless persona. When we just looked at the pain points and stripped away a lot of the other demographic information—age, gender, title, company size, etc.—it made things even clearer to us. What mattered were the pain points and how we, as a company, address them.

The Death of Buyer Personas

Since user personas are based on assumptions about our audience, it no longer makes sense to lean on them. We have an incredible amount of data we can use to determine the reality of our buyer’s needs instead of our perceived notion of them. As Barger says, “User personas are dead.”

With all of the tracking we can do on buyer’s journeys, we don’t have to put people into user personas artificially anymore. People put themselves into their own buckets.

This self-identification through a buyer’s own actions gives us a much clearer picture of their true pain points. If someone visits your site via organic search, reads three articles about how to smoke the best pulled pork, then two weeks later buys a smoker from you, do you try to bucket that person by demographics? Or do you look at the topics that resonated best with them and their buyer journey? In this case, it doesn’t matter if the person was 18 or 80, black or white, rich or just getting by. What mattered was what they did and how they engaged with what you created.

New technologies, including natural language processing and predictive analytics, identify the pain points our audiences have, track how they navigate a site by topic instead of by page, and deliver us insights in near real-time.

In a post-user persona world, technology takes us from guessing to knowing.

Tools to Help You Uncover How Your Audience Self-Identifies

Social intelligence gives marketers a deeper understanding of the wants and needs of their audiences in near real-time.

“Today’s social intelligence provides us information about larger groups of people based on actual social behavior—interactions with content that we can segment by awareness, engagement, and conversion,” says Duncan Alney, CEO at Firebelly Marketing. “We can bring granularity into play by interests and behaviors that is actual rather than hypothetical.”

Content intelligence uncovers current gaps in addressing pain points that other companies in your space are exploiting. It also identifies potential audience pain points that are currently underserved in your specific industry. Content intelligence also uncovers the topics that attract people to your site, engage them, and get them to convert.

The result gives you a deeper understanding of what your audience truly needs to move from an inquisitive prospect to a buyer. And it’s based on real data, not assumptions.

Marketing automation systems (MAS) and customer relationship management (CRM) tools also play an essential role in the post-user persona world. These databases of prospect and client information, when combined with content and social intelligence, bring a level of context and personalization buyers will come to expect.

Exit Your Comfort Zone

Buyer personas are simply too antiquated and don’t serve the function they did years ago. Nevertheless, many people I speak to are hesitant to move away from them. Barger summed up their hesitation: “The resistance from marketers to move away from personas is caused by a natural human instinct to stay in their comfort zone.”

Change is hard. Abandoning a fundamental component of marketing like user personas is a huge shift. Many will feel out of their comfort zone, while others will point to all of the data-driven marketing happening and wonder, “If we’re driving everything from data, is marketing going to become bland and boring?”

On the contrary, all of this data will only make marketing more exciting. You’ll be able to go all-in on creative projects with surefire evidence that you’re solving the right problem for the right people, thus delivering real value to your audience and driving business results.

Barger notes, “You’re still able to be creative. You’re just doing it from a smarter starting point.”

Confidence from that smarter starting point will lead to greater creativity, happier audiences, and better business results.

How Do You Create Content and Products Without Buyer Personas?

As technology advances and more data becomes readily available, everyone will find their own way of creating granular content that is personalized to the individual. Some will utilize CRM and marketing automation systems to personalize content for individuals on each of their site visits, creating a predictive path for each user. Amazon is a good example of this, though they are far from perfect.

At Ceralytics, we aren’t at a place to personalize every single user interaction. We feel that could do more harm than good—we might lose our company voice in the process. Instead, we now focus on two things:

  1. What is the pain point we want to solve with a communication or product?
  2. What feeling do we want people to have as a result of the communication or product?

The pain points come directly out of our content intelligence. We know what pain points resonate with our audiences across our site and our competitors’ sites. We know which pain points drive people to our site and which pain points lead them to take a buying action through our conversion analysis.

The feeling we want to instill in others, the one in that second bullet point, comes from the core of our brand. Speaking with a different voice to every demographic doesn’t feel genuine. Instead, we speak with one voice to that pain point, whether the person with that pain point is 18 or 80.

That authentic voice should come from the core of your company as well. Why does your company do what it does? As best selling author and marketing consultant Simon Sinek would say, “What is your why?” Be true to that mission. Be true to your company’s voice. Don’t placate your audience.

Identify the real pain points your audience has, and then speak with your voice to solve them. That’s far more valuable than any buyer persona.

http://ift.tt/2rOIKVJ

How to use Digital to Attract Chinese Tourists to Your Museum

How to use Digital to Attract Chinese Tourists to Your Museum

The concept of a museum is less than 200 years old. A museum is a good place to learn about culture and history. Museum

  • There are more tourists from China than any other country in the world (120M)
  • These numbers are increasing (it is just the start?) as only 10% of the Chinese population has a passport

Should museums use Digital Marketing to get more Chinese travelers?

According to the U.S. Travel Association, Chinese tourists spend on average $7,200 per visit per person. This includes travel and lodging. While 85% of the money goes to shopping, nearly 36% goes to art museums and galleries.

Over 6.15 million Chinese traveled abroad during the Chinese New Year 2017. 

Foreign museums, especially French museums such as the Louvre Museum and the Palace of Versailles take an important place on social networks and Chinese Internet.

http://ift.tt/2Go9zTL

How to Sell More With Facebook Custom Audiences

Want more sales from your Facebook ads? Wondering which type of Facebook custom audience works best at each stage of the customer journey? In this article, you’ll discover how to pair Facebook custom audiences with different types of prospects to create an effective Facebook marketing funnel. Structure Your Facebook Campaigns for Maximum Return When you

This post How to Sell More With Facebook Custom Audiences first appeared on .
- Your Guide to the Social Media Jungle

http://ift.tt/2noqeOf

Google Questions and Answers: A Case Study

Posted by MiriamEllis

Ever since Google rolled out Questions and Answers in mid-2017, I’ve been trying to get a sense of its reception by consumers and brands. Initially restricted to Android Google Maps, this fascinating feature which enables local business owners and the public to answer consumer questions made it to desktop displays this past December, adding yet another data layer to knowledge panels and local finders.

As someone who has worked in Q&A forums for the majority of my digital marketing life, I took an immediate shine to the idea of Google Questions and Answers. Here’s a chance, I thought, for consumers and brands to take meaningful communication to a whole new level, exchanging requests, advice, and help so effortlessly. Here’s an opportunity for businesses to place answers to FAQs right upfront in the SERPs, while also capturing new data about consumer needs and desires. So cool!

But, so far, we seem to be getting off to a slow start. According to a recent, wide-scale GetFiveStars study, 25% of businesses now have questions waiting for them. I decided to hone in on San Francisco and look at 20 busy industries in that city to find out not just how many questions were being asked, but also how many answers were being given, and who was doing the answering. I broke down responders into three groups: Local Guides (LGs), random users (RUs), and owners (Os). I looked at the top 10 businesses ranking in the local finder for each industry:

Industry Number of Questions Number of Answers LGs RUs Os
Dentists 1 0 0 0 0
Plumbers 2 0 - - -
Chiropractors 0 - - - -
Mexican Restaurants 10 23 22 1 -
Italian Restaurants 15 20 19 1 -
Chinese Restaurants 16 53 49 4 -
Car Dealers 4 5 3 2 -
Supermarkets 7 27 24 3 -
Clothing Stores 4 1 1 - -
Florists 1 0 - - -
Hotels 44 142 114 28 -
Real Estate Agencies 0 - - - -
General Contractors 1 0 - - -
Cell Phone Stores 14 3 3 - -
Yoga Studios 1 0 - - -
Banks 1 0 - - -
Carpet Cleaning 0 - - - -
Hair Salons 1 0 - - -
Locksmiths 1 0 - - -
Jewelry Stores 0 - - - -
Takeaways from the case study

Here are some patterns and oddities I noticed from looking at 123 questions and 274 answers:

  1. There are more than twice as many answers as questions. While many questions received no answers, others received five, ten, or more.
  2. The Owners column is completely blank. The local businesses I looked at in San Francisco are investing zero effort in answering Google Questions and Answers.
  3. Local Guides are doing the majority of the answering. Of the 274 answers provided, 232 came from users who have been qualified as Local Guides by Google. Why so lopsided? I suspect the answer lies in the fact that Google sends alerts to this group of users when questions get asked, and that they can earn 3 points per answer they give. Acquiring enough points gets you perks like 3 free months of Google Play Music and a 75% discount off Google Play Movies.

    Unfortunately, what I’m seeing in Google Questions and Answers is that incentivizing replies is leading to a knowledge base of questionable quality. How helpful is it when a consumer asks a hotel if they have in-room hair dryers and 10 local guides jump on the bandwagon with “yep”? Worse yet, I saw quite a few local guides replying “I don’t know,” “maybe,” and even “you should call the business and ask.” Here and there, I saw genuinely helpful answers from the Local Guides, but my overall impression didn’t leave me feeling like I’d stumbled upon a new Google resource of matchless expertise.
  4. Some members of the public seem to be confused about the use of this feature. I noticed people using the answer portion to thank people who replied to their query, rather than simply using the thumbs up widget.

    Additionally, I saw people leaving reviews/statements, instead of questions: And with a touch of exasperated irony: And to rant:
  5. Some industries are clearly generating far more questions than others. Given how people love to talk about hotels and restaurants, I wasn’t surprised to see them topping the charts in sheer volume of questions and answers. What did surprise me was not seeing more questions being asked of businesses like yoga studios, florists, and hair salons; before I actually did the searches, I might have guessed that pleasant, “chatty” places like these would be receiving lots of queries.
Big brands everywhere are leaving Google Questions and Answers unanswered

I chose San Francisco for my case study because of its general reputation for being hip to new tech, but just in case my limited focus was presenting a false picture of how local businesses are managing this feature, I did some random searches for big brands around the state and around the country.

I found questions lacking owner answers for Whole Foods, Sephora, Taco Bell, Macy’s, Denny’s, Cracker Barrel, Target, and T-Mobile. As I looked around the nation, I noted that Walmart has cumulatively garnered thousands of questions with no brand responses.

But the hands-down winner for a single location lacking official answers is Google in Mountain View. 103 questions as of my lookup and nary an owner answer in sight. Alphabet might want to consider setting a more inspiring example with their own product… unless I’m misunderstanding their vision of how Google Questions and Answers is destined to be used.

Just what is the vision for Google Questions and Answers, I wonder?

As I said at the beginning of this post, it’s early days yet to predict ultimate outcomes. Yet, the current lay of the land for this feature has left me with more questions than answers:

  • Does Google actually intend questions to be answered by brands, or by the public? From what I’ve seen, owners are largely unaware of or choosing to ignore this feature many months post-launch. As of writing this, businesses are only alerted about incoming questions if they open the Google Maps app on an Android phone or tablet. There is no desktop GMB dashboard section for the feature. It’s not a recipe for wide adoption. Google has always been a fan of a crowdsourcing approach to their data, so they may not be concerned, but that doesn’t mean your business shouldn’t be.
  • What are the real-time expectations for this feature? I see many users asking questions that needed fast answers, like “are you open now?” while others might support lengthier response times, as in, “I’m planning a trip and want to know what I can walk to from your hotel.” For time-sensitive queries, how does Questions and Answers fit in with Google’s actual chat feature, Google Messaging, also rolled out last summer? Does Google envision different use cases for both features? I wonder if one of the two products will win out over time, while the other gets sunsetted.
  • What are the real, current risks to brands of non-management? I applauded Mike Blumenthal’s smart suggestion of companies proactively populating the feature with known FAQs and providing expert answers, and I can also see the obvious potential for reputation damage if rants or spam are ignored. That being said, my limited exploration of San Francisco has left me wondering just how many people (companies or consumers) are actually paying attention in most industries. Google Knowledge Panels and the Local Finder pop-ups are nearing an information bloat point. Do you want to book something, look at reviews, live chat, see menus, find deals, get driving directions, make a call? Websites are built with multiple pages to cover all of these possible actions. Sticking them all in a 1” box may not equal the best UX I’ve ever seen, if discovery of features is our goal.
  • What is the motivation for consumers to use the product? Personally, I’d be more inclined to just pick up the phone to ask any question to which I need a fast answer. I don’t have the confidence that if I queried Whole Foods in the AM as to whether they’ve gotten in organic avocados from California, there’d be a knowledge panel answer in time for my lunch. Further, some of the questions I’ve asked have received useless answers from the public, which seems like a waste of time for all parties. Maybe if the feature picks up momentum, this will change.
  • Will increasing rates of questions = increasing rates of business responses? According to the GetFiveStars study linked to above, total numbers of questions for the 1700 locations they investigated nearly doubled between November–December of 2017. From my microscopic view of San Francisco, it doesn’t appear to me that the doubling effect also happened for owner answers. Time will tell, but for now, what I’m looking for is question volume reaching such a boiling point that owners feel obligated to jump into management, as they have with reviews. We’re not there yet, but if this feature is a Google keeper, we could get there.
So what should you be doing about Google Questions and Answers?

I’m a fan of early adoption where it makes sense. Speculatively, having an active Questions and Answers presence could end up as a ranking signal. We’ve already seen it theorized that use of another Google asset, Google Posts, may impact local pack rankings. Unquestionably, leaving it up to the public to answer questions about your business with varying degrees of accuracy carries the risk of losing leads and muddying your online presence to the detriment of reputation. If a customer asks if your location has wheelchair access and an unmotivated third party says “I don’t know,” when, in fact, your business is fully ADA-compliant, your lack of an answer becomes negative customer service. Because of this, ignoring the feature isn’t really an option. And, while I wouldn’t prioritize management of Questions and Answers over traditional Google-based reviews at this point, I would suggest:

  1. Do a branded search today and look at your knowledge panel to see if you’ve received any questions. If so, answer them in your best style, as helpfully as possible
  2. Spend half an hour this week translating your company’s 5 most common FAQs into Google Questions and Answers queries and then answering them. Be sure you’re logged into your company’s Google account when you reply, so that your message will be officially stamped with the word “owner.” Whether you proactively post your FAQs while logged into your business’ account is up to you. I think it’s more transparent to do so.
  3. If you’re finding this part of your Knowledge Panel isn’t getting any questions, checking it once a week is likely going to be enough for the present.
  4. If you happen to be marketing a business that is seeing some good Questions and Answers activity, and you have the bandwidth, I’d add checking this to the daily social media rounds you make for the purpose of reputation management. I would predict that if Google determines this feature is a keeper, they’ll eventually start sending email alerts when new queries come in, as they’re now doing with reviews, which should make things easier and minimize the risk of losing a customer with an immediate need. Need to go pro on management right now due to question volume? GetFiveStars just launched an incredibly useful Google Q&A monitoring feature, included in some of their ORM software packages. Looks like a winner!
  5. Do be on the lookout for spam inquiries and responses, and report them if they arise.

If you’re totally new to Google Questions and Answers, this simple infographic will get you going in a flash:

For further tips on using Google Questions and Answers like a pro, I recommend following GetFiveStars’ 3-part series on this topic.

My questions, your answers

My case study is small. Can you help expand our industry’s knowledge base by answering a few questions in the comments to add to the picture of the current rate of adoption/usefulness of Google’s Questions and Answers? Please, let me know:

  1. Have you asked a question using this feature?
  2. Did you receive an answer and was it helpful?
  3. Who answered? The business, a random user, a Local Guide?
  4. Have you come across any examples of business owners doing a good job answering questions?
  5. What are your thoughts on Google Questions and Answers? Is it a winner? Worth your time? Any tips?

Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

http://ift.tt/2GpXL3x

Saturday, January 27, 2018

YouTube Monetization and Partnership Changes

Welcome to this week’s edition of the Social Media Marketing Talk Show, a news show for marketers who want to stay on the leading edge of social media. On this week’s Social Media Marketing Talk Show, we explore we explore YouTube monetization and partnership changes with Steve Dotto, Instagram Stories updates with Jeff Sieh, and

This post YouTube Monetization and Partnership Changes first appeared on .
- Your Guide to the Social Media Jungle

http://ift.tt/2GlTUnT

Friday, January 26, 2018

Recommended Marketing Podcasts: Week of January 22

Recommended Marketing Podcasts Week of January 22

Podcasts are a great way to educate yourself. Whether you’re on the train, in the car, at your desk, or anywhere in between, this medium is an incredible vehicle for supplementing your industry knowledge. Every week, I’ll be sharing with you some of the best marketing podcasts around, spanning the whole marketing landscape.

Whether you’re new to podcasts or you’re a seasoned listener, I know you’ll find value in each weekly round-up. Let’s get listening, shall we?

The Science of Social Media

The Science of Social Media 77: Big Changes To The Facebook News Feed: What To Know & How It Will Affect Your Strategy

Have you heard about Facebook? It’s this cool little site that your mom, your favorite sandwich shop, everyone you’ve ever met, and two billion other people use every once in a while. You should check it out; you’ll enjoy it. Just don’t use the poke button. Please.

About ten days ago, Facebook made its big announcement that we’ve all known was coming for years: Organic reach is dead. While Facebook isn’t coming out and saying it in plain English, the new Big Blue certainly caused quite the stir in the marketing world. Buffer podcast co-hosts Brian Peters and Hailley Griffis discuss the announcement in this must-listen episode.

Takeaways: The trick is producing and sharing content that makes people want to interact. Hailley herself cops to the very thing that prompted Facebook’s change: “I, myself, don’t really use Facebook that much anymore.” Instagram, she says, has provided a much more intimate and personal experience, one she’s lost on Facebook. She hopes Instagram doesn’t fall prey to the same problems as its parent site.

In short, the easiest way to make the Facebook algorithm happy is to publish content that sparks back-and-forth conversation among friends. This doesn’t mean just publishing “A versus B” posts, which Facebook discourages in its press release, but rather identifying the pulse of your audience.

This is good and bad, of course. The good is that we, the consumers, will get a more enjoyable Facebook experience, with more of the things we care about and less of the random brand we forgot to unlike back in 2014. For marketers and businesses, this is good because it forces us to get back to basics and focus on the customer.

The bad? You may have to revisit that beautiful 2018 Facebook strategy you worked on during Q4. Sorry, friends.

The Business of Story

Business of Story #128: How to Tell Your Brand Story on Purpose With Social Media

In this episode, host Park Howell welcomes Miri Rodriguez, a story brand marketing master at Microsoft (which sounds like an absolute dream job to me). Miri has helped Microsoft create Story Pillars which the organization uses to humanize its brand, mission, and products. Fortunately for us, Park brought her onto the show to walk us through just exactly what it’s like being a Storyteller for a major tech giant and how we can apply her learnings to our businesses.

Takeaways: While a business wants to see data and understand the nuts and bolts, the humans around the table, on the phone, or on the webinar need to feel connected for anything to truly catch. “We as humans are all natural storytellers; we just don’t know it,” Miri says. “We’ve made [storytelling] a big buzzword, but when we boil it down, it’s something we do every day.”

Miri explained her own story to Park, and he terrifically summed up her goal at Microsoft, as well as the ultimate goal all storytellers and content marketers should strive for: Talk about the impact you have on people’s lives, not the product itself. Miri agreed with Park wholeheartedly, and I am right on board with them. It’s something I strive for with my company. I hope you’ll follow this and the rest of Miri’s advice.

Brand storytelling pro tip: Talk about the impact you have on people’s lives, not the product itself.
Click To Tweet

The Beancast

The Beancast 480: Do You Know Me?

On this week’s episode of The Beancast—the best roundtable marketing podcast on the market, in my opinion—host Bob Knorpp is joined by author and consultant Dan Goldgeier, Aaron Strout (CMO, W2O Group), and Julian Zilberbrand (EVP Data Science, Viacom).

These four gentlemen kick the tires on whether the advertising model on the web is about to reach its peak, if blockchain’s underlying tech can truly help us reclaim part of our online identity (safely), YouTube’s recent ad changes, and whether or not the NFL’s streaming struggle with Thursday Night Football spells doom for the immediate future of broadcast television.

Takeaways: While there seems to be a new ad-supported website popping up on the internet just about every day, is this kind of endeavor is actually worth it? Facebook recently announced it will be altering its news feed yet again, and many are beginning to question the legitimacy of advertising in general. Even though Facebook lacks available ad inventory, Wall Street is still bullish on advertising across the board, be it digital or traditional.

According to an article in The Economist, which Bob and his guests use as a talking point during the podcast, current stock prices indicate American advertising revenues will increase from one percent of GDP today to as much as 1.8 percent of GDP by 2027. That’s an insane jump and one that I doubt people will truly tolerate. Consumers already use AdBlocking software and extensions for a reason. I can’t imagine this sort of news would have them excited to whitelist anytime soon.

That’s all for this edition! I’ll be back with a new batch next week. In the meantime, share any podcasts you think I should know about with me @jwsteiert on Twitter or in the comments below!

http://ift.tt/2ndAc5T